Jul 1 2009

Are these errors pulling a 1-8-7 on your portfolio?

Technically Speaking, Market Analysis and Theory posts some great bullets for trading…

Portfolio Killers

What intrinsic errors (long or short) destroy us?

  • Tips. Doesn’t matter whether it comes from a “name brand” or your next door neighbor. There’s a difference between a tip and inside information. I’m not interested in going to jail (a la Martha Stewart). How many great traders traded on tips? None. How many on inside information? We’ll never know.
  • Averaging down. Stuff that is going down is failing for a reason. Maybe ’stuff’ isn’t the correct operative word.
  • Watching options time premium go to zero. More people make money selling options than buying them. Options are terrific for risk control and volatility trading, but I’m especially leery of being short naked options.
  • Trading against breadth. Today the breadth is strong and it’s the first day of the month. Getting short here isn’t stupid, it’s suicide.
  • Having excessively big position size. What would happen if you got “Madoffed” by any one of your positions? Think Madoff can get life insurance?
  • Getting into, or out of positions for no reason. It always boils down to holding winners and blowing out losers.


Jun 30 2009

Supply pushes grain prices down today

LA Times (who ‘d have thought LA worried about grain markets?!)

Wheat, Corn and Beans futures are all coming off lately but Corn was the victim today.

Locked limit down on the CBOT…can’t wait to see tomorrow’s action.

From Bloomberg News:

“About 87.035 million acres were planted with corn, the U.S. Department of Agriculture said today in a report following a survey of farmers. That was up 2.4% from the March forecast on growers’ intentions and 1.2% higher than the 85.98 million last year. The average estimate of 24 analysts in a Bloomberg News survey was for 85.16 million acres.

“The U.S. corn report showed ‘an awfully big acreage number and suggests inventories will be more comfortable,’ said Tim Emslie, a research manager at Country Hedging Inc. in Inner Grove Heights, Minnesota.”

Near-term corn futures in Chicago today have plunged the maximum daily limit of 30 cents, to $3.47 a bushel. The price has tumbled 23% from $4.49 a bushel June 2.


Jun 23 2009

Did you know that you lose money making these 10 mistakes?

The Pragmatic Capitalist highlights the top 10 mistakes that cost traders money. I know that I fight these and often find myself with an expectation bias. Which are you guilty of? Read it over there.

WHY YOU (LIKELY) TRADE LIKE A LOSER

23 JUNE 2009 BY TPC 12 COMMENTS

There was a great article in the Sydney Morning Herald on trading and why most traders lose money.  Regular readers know that I focus a lot of time and energy on understanding not only the psychology behind my own trading, but also the psychology of other traders.  General Patton once said: “if everyone is thinking the same then someone isn’t thinking”.  These words are never more applicable than they are to markets.  After all, the name of the game, more often than not, is being in the trade before anyone else expects it.  Markets rarely move where the majority of investors expect them to move.  The article broke down the reasons for losing into 7 different common emotional mistakes:

1. Emotional bias: the tendency to believe the things that make you feel good and to disregard things that make you feel bad. In trading terms, this means ignoring the bad news and focusing on the good news. It’s called losing objectivity; you don’t recognise when things go wrong because you don’t want to.

This is the primary reason why most traders lose money.  I believe it is mostly due to the fact that the majority of investors are generally biased in their thinking.  They are trained to believe that buying stocks is the best way to invest in a market.  They therefore ignore the other side of trades or other asset classes.  This bias generally leads to a permabull perspective (or a permabear perspective for the more pessimistic).  The general optimism of most traders (or pessimism) leads to cloudy thinking.  Learning to be unbiased and flexible are perhaps the two most important rules to becoming a good trader.  Trading one asset class with one directional bias would be like a professional baseball pitcher deciding to throw nothing but fastballs.  You have many options and pitches – utilize them all.

2. Expectation bias: the tendency to believe in things that you expect. In financial terms this means not bothering to analyse, test, measure or doubt the conclusion you expect or hope for. It is also known as the law of small numbers – believing in something with little real evidence.

Focusing too much on the macro picture can often lead to this kind of skewed thinking.  Peter Schiff is a great example.  His macro inflationary theme is likely to be correct over the long-term, but in the near-term he has cost himself and his investors a great deal of money by not being more flexible and being able to adjust to the micro changes in the economy.  I expect this current bear market to persist much longer, but that hasn’t stopped me from being bullish at times during the last 18 months.  The market is a dynamic system and is constantly changing.  Learn to evolve and change with it.

3. The disposition effect: the tendency to cut your profits and let your losses run – the opposite of what a trader should be doing. Making small profits and big losses is a recipe for disaster.

This is almost entirely due to a lack of discipline.  All investors should have rules.  Have price targets and set stops.  Learn to be robotic in your investing style.  If you give your emotions the opportunity to get in the way of your trading I can guarantee you they will.  Hope is not a strategy when a trade doesn’t go the way you planned.  One of the best parts about the stock market is that polygamy is perfectly acceptable.  You aren’t married to any single position.  Learn to “dump” the losers and move on to the next trade.

More over at TPC…

Also at the Sydney Morning Herald “Why you behave like a loser”


Jun 18 2009

“Facebook has become a toy. Once a service recommends my father-in-law to me, it no longer adds any value in my life.” Howard Lindzon

HT to Damien Hoffman aka Wall Street Cheat Sheet

Damien: Do you have a core personal philosophy you tapped to develop that theory?

Howard: Yeah. In my soul I believe that positivity is rewarded. I truly believe in karma. I hang around with positive people who don’t keep score — which limits the people you hang around. For example, when I go out to dinner with people and everyone adds up the bill and I owe $11.22, you’re not going to see me hanging out with that group of people. Life’s too short. There’s no quarterly balance sheet. The balance sheet is over a much longer time frame. This philosophy is not going to make me the richest person in the world, but sometimes the richest people are the cheapest. I see this as one’s inner-gauge, which ultimately becomes that person’s lifestyle.

Twitter is interesting for this very reason. If your a negative person, you can’t hide that on Twitter for six months. For example, when I blog I can go through a negative phase, but on Twitter if I twit something negative, a few tweets later I’m back to positive again because Twitter is who you are. That’s why the feeds in Twitter and Facebook are so popular: you can’t hide who you are. If you’re a miserable fuck — and I could name five of them but I don’t want to give them the credibility — you’ll have your following but your followers are all miserable fucks too. That’s why the tech guys have been penciled into a corner with the nerds who like to fight all the time. They haven’t been as successful on Twitter because they’re always fighting. On the other hand, the entertainers have taken over Twitter because they are entertainers — they do things that are positive or funny or have something irreverent to say. That appeals to a much broader audience.

Damien: Do you prefer Facebook or Twitter?

Howard: Facebook is just too fake for me. First of all, Facebook is littered with people making mistakes because they think what is funny really isn’t. Second, it’s a big lie because people get to post the pictures they want everyone to see — like during high school when you put stuff on your wall. Everyone does the same thing: they hang what represents who they want to be, not what represents who they truly are.

Damien: You did a cool blog post about how Facebook is the ego and Twitter is the Id.

Howard: Exactly. I am not on Twitter’s recommended list. People who follow me have stuck with me because I share or because I make them laugh. That’s how I live my life. However, on Facebook I have a lot more followers, but I never go there. When someone follows me on Facebook they have a perceived vision of me. If they knew the real me, the one on Twitter, they’d have a fucking heart attack — they’d never invest with me again. [Laughing.]


Jun 9 2009

Peak Oil another perspective

The Walrus is analgous to our New Yorker magazine here stateside but don’t hold that against the piece below regarding peak oil.  It is lengthy but snuggle up to a large cup of  ”if they’re right, go long…”

http://www.walrusmagazine.com/articles/2009.06-energy-an-inconvenient-talk/

Dave Hughes is driving north on Highway 2. Headed out of Calgary, where he worked for thirty-two years at the Geological Survey of Canada, mapping the nation’s coal reserves. Bound for Edmonton, where he grew up and earned two degrees in geology. It’s not yet dawn, the sky deep black and the windows of his pickup truck like mirrors, the southbound lanes a line of smeared headlights as long-haul commuters make the trek the other way into the capital of the oil patch. Hughes sips coffee from a reusable mug, fighting back sleepiness. Just another commuter trailing a cloud of burnt dinosaur bones on his way to work.